HARRY POTTER, SORCERY AND FANTASY
by Marcia Montenegro
Written June, 2000
Harry Potter is a character in
a series of books written by J. K. Rowling about a young boy who
discovers he is really a wizard, in other words, a sorcerer. Four books
have come out in the Harry Potter series, with 3.8 million copies of the
fourth book being released in the U.S. on July 8, 2000. Worldwide, 35
million copies of the first three books are in print, with about half of
total sales in the U.S. (“USA Today,” 6-22-00, p. D-1). The first book,
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, was released in England
as Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. The “Philosopher’s
Stone” is part of the lore of alchemy and medieval sorcery, and was
supposedly a stone which could be used to turn base metal to gold, and
was the Holy Grail of sorcery (Bill Whitcomb, The Magician’s
Companion, St. Paul: Llewellyn, 1994, pp. 351, 485, 527).
Rowling has been hailed as a
clever, imaginative writer whose books have enticed children into
reading again. This is no doubt true. However clever or imaginative the
stories are, they do center on a character who is learning the arts of
sorcery and witchcraft. One defense, or minimization of the sorcery in
the Harry Potter books, is that the stories are just a normal part of a
child’s fantasy world. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis are often brought up as
examples. But are Tolkien and Lewis the standard for discernment? Even
so, Lewis did not endorse the occult. And if Tolkien did, does that make
it okay? (When I was an astrologer, my witch clients and friends loved
Tolkien, by the way). Yes, Lewis and Tolkien wrote fantasy novels that
included magical elements, but the question for Christians should be, is
the fantasy (in any story) centered on the occult, and what does God say
about the occult?
It is pointed out that Harry
Potter represents good fighting evil, and therefore, in the context of
fantasy, this is okay. These views, however, raise several questions: Is
the sorcery and magic in Harry Potter just fantasy? If not, are fantasy
stories using occultism as a model healthy reading? Is it Biblical to
accept the use of “good” magical power if it is used to fight evil? Is
there such a thing as “good” sorcery? Any popular children’s book set in
an occult environment offering a hero who practices the occult arts
warrants careful examination and a Biblical response. Occult sources are
used for this article to make the point that occultism is real and is
part of a serious practice, philosophy and spirituality that is opposed
to historic, Biblical Christianity.
Note to anyone
practicing Wicca/witchcraft and/or sorcery who may read this
article: This article is not an attack on you as a person; it
is an analysis of the practice of occultism as seen in the light of
God’s word. I myself was a professional astrologer for several years and
involved in various forms of the occult. It is my genuine desire that
you read this article and realize that while God condemns the occult, He
has reached out to you in love and grace in offering you forgiveness and
eternal life through faith in Christ. As you know, not all Wiccans,
occultists, ritual magicians, etc., agree on occult concepts and
definitions, so it is unlikely that everyone will agree with how I have
presented occult views, although I have quoted from occult sources.
SORCERY AND WITCHCRAFT
ARE REAL
Although Harry Potter attends the Hogwarts School
of Witchcraft and Wizardry, what is really being described in the book
is sorcery. Sorcery and witchcraft in some cultures are the same thing.
According to one source, “European witchcraft grew out of sorcery, the
casting of spells and divination,” (Rosemary Guiley, Encyclopedia of
Witches and Witchcraft, New York: Checkmark Books/Facts on File,
1999, p.315). Since there is no Hebrew word for witchcraft, some Bible
translations will use the term “witchcraft” while others will use
“sorcery.” Rather than using a label, Hebrew describes the practices of
what is translated by each culture as sorcery or witchcraft, such as
using potions (or poison), incantations to spirits, communing with the
dead, etc. Each culture and its language comes up with the label of
witchcraft or sorcery according to particular cultural understanding and
practices. [See Note A at end of article for further explanation].
Contemporary witchcraft,
especially in the United States, is a form of religious Neo-paganism,
and is not sorcery, which is an occult practice. Although varied in its
beliefs from group to group, witchcraft and Wicca usually encompass the
views of honoring nature as sacred, monism (all is one energy),
polytheism (many gods), and pantheism (all is God/Goddess) or
panentheism (God/Goddess is contained within the world). A well-known
witch couple state that “The rationale of Wicca is a philosophical
framework into which every phenomenon, from chemistry to clairvoyance,
from logarithms to love, can be reasonably fitted,” (Janet and Stewart
Farrar, A Witches’ Bible, Part 2, Custer, WA: Phoenix
Publishing, 1996, p. 106). While witches and Wiccans might practice
magick (occult magick is often spelled with a ‘k’) or cast spells, they
would more likely consider it “white magick” and not sorcery. [See the
CANA document on Witchcraft and
Wicca for further information].
Those who practice sorcery may
adopt some pagan beliefs, but do not usually identify with witchcraft.
Contemporary sorcery is based on a belief of accessing and manipulating
energy through various methods. There are those who practice ritual
magick, an involved form of sorcery based on teachings going back to
ancient societies. Some equate ritual magic with ‘High Magic,’ described
in one book as teaching “how to reach one’s personal genius, the
Guardian Angel who watches over each individual life and who is waiting
faithfully and patiently to make man’s every wish come true,” (Migene
Gonzalez-Wippler, The Complete Book of Spells, Ceremonies &
Magic, St. Paul: Llewellyn, 1996, second edition, p 64). Many
ritual magicians may also use some of the writings and philosophy of
infamous magician Aleister Crowley, who died in 1947. (By the way,
Crowley was not a Satanist, although some Satanists use him as a model
and adopt his Thelemic Law, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the
law,” allegedly given to Crowley by his Guardian Angel/spirit guide,
Aiwass, [Guiley, 71-72]).
Magic is “the art of changing
consciousness and physical reality according to will,” and sorcery is
“the manipulation of natural forces and powers to achieve a desired
objective,”(Guiley, 212, 314). Another definition of sorcery is offered
by Lewis Spence as using “supposed supernatural power by the agency of
evil spirits called forth by spells by a witch or black magician (An
Encyclopedia of Occultism, Citadel Press/Carol Publishing, 1996, p.
373). Here is a definition by a magician: “Magic is a collection of
techniques, dating back 70,000 years, aimed at manipulating the human
imagination in order to produce physical, psychological, or spiritual
results,” (J. H. Brennan, Magick for Beginners, The Power to Change
Your World, St. Paul: Llewellyn, 1999, p. 44). This latter book, by
the way, was given to me by a 14-year-old teenager attending a Christian
youth group.
Highly respected (by
occultists) ritual magician Donald Tyson states in his booklet, The
Truth About Ritual Magick, (Llewellyn, 1994): “ Ritual is a
mechanism for changing all four levels of being: physical, emotional,
mental, and spiritual” and “Through magic a channel of awareness can be
opened between the spirit or Higher Self, and the ego or ordinary self
allowing the Higher Self, which always knows who it is and what it wants
to do, to direct and shape the ego, thereby restoring a balance to the
emotions and improving health,” (p. 20). We see that sorcery/magic is
not just a practice, but has a spiritual context. A 16-year-old boy
raised in a Christian home once quoted Tyson to me when discussing his
“dabbling” in the occult.
An unnumbered page in the front
of Tyson’s booklet tells us that Tyson “devotes his life to the
attainment of a complete gnosis of the art of magic in theory and
practice. His purpose is to formulate an accessible system of personal
training composed of East and West, past and present, that will help the
individual discover the reason for one’s existence and a way to fulfill
it.” Gnosis means knowledge, and usually implies an esoteric
knowledge through which one gains spiritual wisdom. Gnosticism, the term
for a religion which was one of the primary enemies of the early church,
came from this word.
Crowley’s definition of magick:
“Magick is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity
with Will,” (as quoted in Whitcomb, 5). Whitcomb himself describes magic
as “a way of creating the world,” and “a pragmatic approach to changing
the human psyche and, through it, the surrounding world,” (6, 7).
Sorcerers take their practice very seriously; it is no fantasy, but a
very real part of the occult arts. [See Note B at end of article for
further information].
Some of what is taught at
Hogwarts could be part of either sorcery or contemporary witchcraft, or
both: studying the movement of the planets, the history of magic,
herbology, potions, spells, and charms. Although it is valid to clarify
witchcraft vs. sorcery, whether Harry Potter is called a witch, wizard,
or sorcerer is irrelevant when looking at the content of these books to
determine if they are appropriate for young people. Sorcery is nothing
less than the attempt to replace God, since it is one’s will that is
primary in practicing sorcery. What must be examined are the ideas and
teachings contained in the book. This essay is based on the first book,
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, which has more than
ample material to discuss. [All quotes from the first Scholastics trade
paperback printing, September 1999].
THE PHILOSOPHER’S STONE
AND ALCHEMY
Central to the plot, and part of the title, is the
sorcerer’s stone, in actuality “the philosopher’s stone,” (title changed
for books in the U.S. and France). The philosopher’s stone is connected
to alchemy, an occult practice that combined the exploration of minerals
with Gnostic practices of sorcery seeking to turn base metal into gold,
and through that, attain an inner spiritual transformation. Alchemy is
defined by one occultist as “ the process of the transmutation and
purification...of the soul via the discipline of purifying and combining
physical materials and chemicals which are symbolic of spiritual
transformations,” and the Philosopher’s Stone was a “metaphor for the
illuminated mind,” and the “First Substance from which all other metals
derived,” (Whitcomb, 485, 527).
Further descriptions of alchemy
reveal its metaphysical nature: “High magic and alchemy are twin
branches of the magical system known as Hermetism...,” and “There is an
intrinsic link between alchemy and the Kabbalah....Like alchemy, the
Kabbalah sees three planes in nature -- the mental, the astral, and the
material [...]Thus, the alchemist, a Hermetic magician, bases his
physical and spiritual work on the Kabbalah, particularly the Tarot..”
(Gonzalez-Wippler, pp. 61 and 63). The Kabbalah is too complex to
describe here; suffice it to say that it is an occultic Gnostic
perversion of Judaism which “is a complete system of symbolism,
angelology, demonology, and magic” (W. B. Crow, A Fascinating
History of Witchcraft, Magic, and Occultism, Hollywood: Wilshire
Book Company, 1968, p. 82). The Tarot are a set of cards used for
divination.
Rowling refers to Nicolas
Flamel in the first Harry Potter book (103, 219) as the partner in
alchemy of Albus Dumbledore, the headmaster of Hogwarts. Harry and his
friends search through the library, looking for Flamel’s name to see who
he is (197-8) and finally read about him as the “only known maker of the
Sorcerer’s Stone” which can turn metal into gold and gives immortality
through producing the “Elixir of Life,” (219, 220). In Harry
Potter, Flamel has achieved immortality because he is 665 years old
(220).
According to Jacques Sadoul in
Alchemists and Gold (G. P. Putnams’ Sons: New York; 1970),
Flamel was a “Fourteenth century French adept and Public Scrivener,” (p.
243) and a key figure in the story of alchemy. An “adept” is a master of
esoteric knowledge, including occultism. Flamel is also mentioned
several times in the well-known Witchcraft, Magic &
Alchemy, (Grillot de Givry, Dover publications, 1971, pp. 216, 349,
352, 360, 367, 378, 384) and in a book by the editors of GNOSIS Magazine
(Richard Smoley and Jay Kinney, Hidden Wisdom, A Guide to the
Western Inner Traditions, New York: Penguin/Arkana, 1999, p. 184).
Rowling’s book mentions
Flamel’s wife as “Perenelle,” and that Flamel and his wife are over six
hundred years old due to Flamel’s success with the Philosopher’s Stone
and discovery of the Elixir of Life, rendering him immortal (220). In
Spence’s Encyclopedia of Occultism, Flamel’s wife is rendered
as Petronella (there are probably several variations of this name).
Spence states that Flamel first studied astrology before coming across a
book with instructions and pictures of serpents which purported to be an
occult book by an alchemist and magician named Abraham, circa 1400
(1-2); this led Flamel to further studies, finally achieving the ability
to turn mercury into gold and the discovery of the elixir of life (162),
just as it is stated in Rowling’s book. Flamel gained a reputation as a
magician and “his followers believed that he was still alive though
retired from he world, and would live for six centuries,” (162).
Spence’s book devotes over three pages to alchemy (9-12). If Flamel was
a partner with Dumbledore, the fictional headmaster of Hogwarts, then
that naturally makes Dumbledore a practitioner of occultism. Dumbledore
is fictional, but Flamel and alchemy are part of the history of occult
practices.
Sadoul quotes someone named
Claude d’Yge at the beginning of his book, who cautions against seeing
alchemy as entirely mundane or entirely spiritual, and urges instead to
see that “Alchemy is but a symbol used to reveal by analogy the process
of achieving ‘Spiritual Realisation’ -- in a word, that man is at once
the prime matter and the athanor of the Work -- let them pursue it with
all their might.” The “Work” refers to the “Great Work” of alchemy. Even
more pointed is this description: “In essence, alchemy has to do with
the liberation and transformation of consciousness. But it is a
transformation of a very specific kind. One might say that the gold
of the alchemists is the body of resurrection,” which is a
“divinization” and immortality of self (Smoley and Kinney, 192). Alchemy
seeks to make man a god, one who can create and transform by his will,
secret knowledge, and magical access to forces.
Sorcery is not a matter of
mechanical actions or pretense at power, but is based on underlying
occult principles and spirituality. As Rowling plainly tells us, “There
was a lot more to magic, as Harry quickly found out, than waving your
wand and saying a few funny words,” (133). Indeed, as any book on
sorcery will bear out, this is true!
MUGGLES
Non-witches, called “Muggles,” are usually
portrayed in this book quite negatively. The family that adopted Harry
after his parents died -- his mother’s sister and her husband, are
painted in the worst possible way. Their admittedly bad character and
opposition to witchcraft (which they see as “weird”) are combined, so
that one is left with the impression that opposition to witchcraft and
the occult is silly, narrow-minded, cruel and the result of stupidity
and ignorance (pp. 1-8, 36, 40, 53, 59).
One sees this portrayal of
Muggles even more clearly in foreign translations of the books. In
Italian, Muggles is translated as “Babbani” which sounds like
“babbioni,” meaning idiots, and the Dutch word is “Dreuzel” sounding
like “dreutel,” slang for a clumsy person ("The Magic Words: Potter Is a
Hit in 33 Languages,” John Kelly, The Washington Post,
“KidsPost,” 7-7-00, p. C-13)
Naturally, part of this is a
plot device so that Harry can finally escape a painful environment, and
many children may identify with this. However, what is Harry escaping
to? The Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry! In fact, many
troubled teens do “escape” to the world of the occult which seems to
offer empowerment, meaning, and a sense of belonging. Are not these what
Harry is seeking at Hogwarts? Is a model based on the occult a safe
place of escape?
GHOSTS
Ghosts populate the first book.
Each of the four houses at the Hogwarts school has a resident ghost.
Also, Harry sees his dead parents in a special mirror and communicates
with them (208-209, 210, 212). The mirror is explained by Dumbledore as
something which “shows us nothing more or less than the deepest, most
desperate desire of our hearts” (213) which leaves the question open as
to whether Harry really saw his deceased parents. Nevertheless, how will
young children interpret this? It is most likely that a child will take
this literally, and believe Harry could see his parents, especially
since the parents respond. God forbids spirit contact and contact with
the dead (Leviticus 19:31, 20:6; Deuteronomy 18: 10-11; Isaiah 8:19); we
are told that the dead have departed to either be with Christ or be in a
place of suffering and cannot be contacted (Luke 16: 19-31; 2
Corinthians 5:8; Philippians 1:21-23). (The mirror is later also used
for divination).
In our culture, we have
mistakenly accepted fictional “friendly” or humorous ghosts (think of
Casper the Friendly Ghost). This has desensitized us to God’s commands
against spirit contact and communication with the dead (Deuteronomy 18:
10-11; Is. 8:19), so that we substitute fiction for truth or downplay
the idea of belief in ghosts. Children are often confused about ghosts
and whether real people hang around after they die. According to the
Bible, this cannot happen, and it is wrong to contact the dead, yet this
book promotes the view that it is possible and a good thing.
ASTROLOGY
In the forbidden forest, Harry and
others meet up with some centaurs (mythical half-man, half-horse
creatures) whom Hagrid calls “stargazers,” (254). Apparently, the
centaurs seek guidance in astrology (257, 259). As one says, “..we are
sworn not to set ourselves against the heavens. Have we not read what is
to come in the movements of the planets?” and “Centaurs are concerned
with what has been foretold,” apparently by the studying of the planets
(257).
Although Harry’s friend,
Hermione, later repeats a critical remark about astrology (which she
heard from a professor and which she says to comfort Harry) as an
“imprecise branch of magic,” (260), it is still considered an occult art
and Hermione is not saying that astrology is to be avoided.
In contrast, God condemns
astrology (Isaiah 47:13-15; Jeremiah 10:2; Amos 5:26-27; Acts 7:42-43)
and all forms of divination (Deuteronomy 18:10-12; 2 Kings 17:17; Acts
16:16 ) (astrology is divination).
DIVINATION, SPELLS AND
OCCULT WORLDVIEWS
This book is full of references to
and sometimes outright use of divination tools, spells, and occult
views.
Harry gets a glimpse of his
dead parents in the Mirror of Erised (‘desire’ spelled backward), and
the mirror is used later by Quirell and Harry to locate the
philosopher’s stone (289-92). When Harry looks in the mirror to get a
vision that will give him the stone’s location, he supernaturally gets
the stone in his pocket (292). Mirrors, still bodies of water, crystals
and other reflective surfaces are used as divination tools in the occult
, a method called scrying or crystallomancy (de Givry, 305-08; Farrar,
201, 326; Guiley, pp. 307-08; Spence, 111-12) . The object favored by
witches was a magic mirror in which they would see visions or receive
mental images after staring into the mirror (Guiley, 398). There is a
long history of mirrors used in the occult, including tales that witches
taught Pythagoras how to divine (fortunetell) by “holding a magic mirror
up to the moon,” and magicians who stared into mirrors until they went
into a light trance and “saw visions that answered the questions that
were put to them.”( Guiley, 229). Scrying in A Witches Bible is
“any form of divination which involves gazing at or into something
(crystal ball, black mirror, pool of ink, etc.) to induce psychically
perceived visual images,” (326). Divination, the practice of obtaining
unknown information through supernatural, esoteric means, occult tools,
or through reading hidden meanings, is strictly forbidden by God
(Deuteronomy 18:10-11; Acts 16:16). Harry does use the mirror as a form
of divination to locate the stone and he seems to know the occult
principle of gazing into the mirror because he tries to stop Quirell
from “giving his whole attention” to it (290).
Subjective feelings and
intuition have priority in the New Age and the occult. Making a decision
is often based on feeling “right” about something. When Harry is buying
a wand, many wands pass through his hands until he finally gets the
“right” one which causes him to feel “a sudden warmth in his fingers,”
(85). In fact, it is not Harry who chooses his wand, but “it’s really
the wand that chooses the wizard,” (82). This is a very occult view of
how things work in the world -- a view of magical correspondence at work
between people and objects. It is almost a form of animism, the belief
that objects contain intelligent forces or spirits.
Wands, which were also known as
divining rods, are well-known in occult arts, and are used for
purifying, divination, focusing energy in a spell, finding water or
treasure, and invoking spirits [including the devil in black magick],
(de Givry, 106-108, 311-320). In contemporary witchcraft, a wand is a
magical working tool and is “the instrument of invocation of spirits,”
(Guiley, 380). The Farrars quote another book that a wand is used “’to
call up and control certain angels and genii’” and is often marked with
occult symbols (257-58)[‘genii’ were believed to be inferior deities
attached to each mortal, {Spence, 239}].One book depicts a photograph of
the aforementioned Aleister Crowley, a “magic wand” in his right hand,
(Gonzalez-Wippler, 287). Occultists often believe that Moses was a
magician who triumphed over the Egyptians and the Red Sea through
sorcery with his staff (de Givry, 311; Guiley, 380). However, the Bible
tells us that it was God who performed these miracles, using Moses
(Exodus 4, 6-11, 14:21).
Before Harry learns he is a
wizard (witch, sorcerer), he visits the zoo and discovers he is able to
communicate with one of its residents. Which animal would that be -- a
noble lion, a mischievous monkey, a swift gazelle? No, it’s a snake, a
boa constrictor. Harry’s actions allow the snake to magically escape
after there has been a silent communication between the two (pp. 27-28).
It is interesting that it is the snake with whom Harry discovers his
magical ability to communicate with animals since snakes have a special
place in the occult, usually as symbols for wisdom, enlightenment,
fertility, or feminine power ( Jack Tresidder, Dictionary of
Symbols, San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1998, 184-87). “The snake
was above all a magico-religious symbol of primeval life force,
sometimes an image of the creator divinity itself,” (Tresidder, 184). It
is not suggested here that the author intends these associations, but it
is a point of interest considering that Harry is a natural
sorcerer.
Owls are used as messenger
birds for the students at Hogwarts. Rosemary Guiley notes that in the
Middle Ages, “demons in the forms of owls attended witches, accompanying
them on their broomstick flights and running errands of evil for them,”
(251). (Of course, witches never rode broomsticks; this is part of
folklore. Nevertheless, it is interesting that owls were messengers for
witches in this folklore and show up in the Harry Potter book also as
messengers).
A “sorting hat” is placed on
the children’s heads in deciding which of the four houses at the school
each child should join. The hat decides this and apparently can read
minds (121). Of course, no hat or object can do these things, but the
practices are real. The attempt to read minds, telepathy, is a psychic
art and is taught in psychic development and other occult classes. Of
course, only God is omniscient and knows the minds and hearts of men
(Job 38:4, Psalms 44:21, Luke. 11:17, Luke. 16;15) .
Spells are taught at Hogwarts
and are used throughout the book, even when Harry’s friends use a
“body-bind” spell on their friend, (273). Interestingly, there is a
spell for binding in A Witches’ Bible (141). Interest in spells
is promoted as a healthy thing when the children are on the train to
Hogwarts and Ron is asked to perform a spell. When he can’t do it,
Hermione brags that she’s already practiced spells by doing “a few
simple spells” and that they worked (105). Books with spells are easy to
find at any bookstore, and even easier on the Internet. They have been
seen in magazines for teenage girls. Witches and others do spells today;
this is not a charming fantasy (pun intended). Silver Ravenwolf, a
witch, has written several books aimed at teens, including 1998’s
Teen Witch, which sold so well that bookstores could hardly
keep it on the shelves. Teen Witch and other similar books are
full of instructions for casting spells. Whether these spells work or
not is beside the point; casting spells and sorcery are occultism and
clearly forbidden by God (Deuteronomy 18: 10-11; 2 Kings 17:17, 20:6;
Isaiah 47: 10-15; Malachi 3:5; Acts 8:11, 13:6; Revelation 18:23,
21:8).
THE DARK
SIDE
References are made to the villain, Voldemort (the
last part of this name, ‘mort,’ is French for ‘death’), and others as
having gone over to the “dark side,” (54, 110). The implication is that
people are not inherently bad, but either basically good or morally
neutral, and can go either way (55). This view, based in the idea of
polarity, ultimately downplays evil itself and the idea of absolute good
and evil. Morality with no absolutes is no morality at all because it
changes according to experience, culture, definition, or historical
context.
It is similar to the Taoist
yin-yang philosophy, which is based on the belief that opposites in the
world are equal forces which are perceived as opposite but are actually
part of the whole, and are in a constant state of fluctuation, merging
into each other. That is why there is a white dot on the black side and
vice-versa. This view has been popularized in the “the Force” of the
Star Wars movies, in which one can go over to the “dark side.” [See CANA
article on Yin-Yang].
The idea of polarity is
essential in occult philosophies and denies a conflict between good and
evil. The Farrars say it well: “The Theory of Polarity maintains that
all activity, all manifestation, arises from (and is inconceivable
without) the interaction of pairs and complementary opposites...and that
this polarity is not a conflict between ‘good’ and ‘evil’, but a
creative tension like that between the positive and negative terminals
of an electric battery. Good and evil only arise with the constructive
or destructive application of the polarity’s output...” (107).
They further state that monotheist religions are trapped in the belief
that good vs. evil are a polarity, and that when evil is vanquished,
only good remains. The Farrars claim that “Under the unchallenged rule
of a non-polarized Creator, nothing can happen,” (111). In other words,
a world without this polarity cannot exist or is bland if it does; good
cannot exist without evil. Of course, “a non-polarized Creator” is
exactly the one true living God and He is absolutely good: “And this is
the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is
light, and in Him there is no darkness at all,” (1 John
1:5).
Rather than God’s views that
all of us having a fallen, sinful nature which is only redeemed through
faith in a crucified and risen Christ (John 3:18-20; Romans 3:23-25;
Colossians 1:13-14), we have a “dark side” and by choice can be good,
totally avoiding the “dark side.” Prof. Quirell, who serves the villain,
cannot touch Harry because Harry has been so deeply loved by his mother;
human love can ward off evil (295, 299). There is no need for redemption
in this worldview. Good and evil are two sides of the same coin, both
part of a greater oneness and of each other, so there is no absolute
good or evil. Even the villain, Voldemort, who is supposed to be evil,
is “not...truly alive [so] he cannot be killed,” (298). In the absence
of absolute good and evil, who needs redemption? In the absence of
absolute good and evil, at what point does one go over to the “dark
side” and who draws the line? The occult, and the book, have no answer
for this.
WHITE
MAGICK, BLACK MAGICK
A popular claim made by
witches today is that they are “white” witches or that they practice
“white” magic and use their powers for good. This idea is central in
this Harry Potter book, since Harry is learning how to use sorcery in a
“good” way. Spells are sometimes used on Muggles (251). Characters in
the book use sorcery to fight “dark” or black magic (190-91, 217, 227)
and there is even a course at Hogwarts teaching students how to protect
themselves against “the dark forces,” (67, 134) all the while they are
studying the very stuff of sorcery -- charms, potions, spells, etc. But
God condemns all sorcery (see previous passages cited), so there is no
such thing as “white” or “dark” magick; it all comes from the same
place. The only people who make these distinctions are occultists.
Remember, Harry is not learning magic tricks; he is learning
magick.
It is interesting to note what
happens at the end of the book, however, after the school has warned the
students “not to use magic over the holidays,” (307). Harry, in defiance
and rebellion, not only purports to use magic, but to use it to get back
at his hated cousin, Dudley: “They don’t know we’re not allowed
to use magic at home. I’m going to have a lot of fun with Dudley this
summer...” (309). This is the closing sentence of the
book.
In light of God’s word, how
should we view a book where the hero is learning sorcery and which
teaches the very principle of “white” magick and witchcraft? If a
Christian thinks it is okay for Harry to do “white” magick, then can
he/she tell a witch in all sincerity that “white” witchcraft is wrong?
To accept Harry Potter as a fun hero for children may make it seem
hypocritical for you to criticize contemporary witchcraft, Wicca, and
white magick.
THE OCCULT AND DEATH
The course on Transfiguration
is said to be “complex and dangerous” by the teacher (134); Dumbledore
tells Harry that men “have wasted away” before the Mirror of Erised or
“been driven mad” by it (213); Prof. Snape talks about how his brews are
“bewitching” to the mind and “ensnaring” to the senses” (137); and there
are books in the Hogwarts library which contain “powerful Dark Magic,”
(198). In a New York Times article (7-10-00, B-1), the reporter
writes about Rowling: “She intimated that as the series progresses the
mood may darken. The death of one character in the fourth book, she
said, is ‘the beginning of the deaths.’”
But the best hurrah for death
comes near the end, when Harry Potter learns that Nicolas Flamel and his
wife will die after the Sorcerer’s Stone has been destroyed. Harry is
sad; but an amazing statement is made by Dumbledore: “After all, to the
well-organized mind, death is but the next great adventure,” (297). This
is repeated later by Harry to his friends, Ron and Hermione
(302).
The occult is always connected
to the death, whether in disguise or blatantly. Dumbledore's statement
reminds me of a comic book I saw in a mall store about a beautiful girl
named Death who tells the hero that “Death is a friend” and whom the
hero wants to follow. In contrast, in Christianity, death is the result
of sin (Romans 5), is called the "last enemy" (1 Corinthians 15:26) and
will be done away with (Revelation 20:14).
After his death remark,
Dumbledore says that truth is a “beautiful and terrible thing, and
should therefore be treated with great caution,” (298). So, truth should
be treated with caution but death is an adventure?
CONCLUSIONS: FANTASY
AND THE OCCULT
There are elements of
fantasy and good story-telling in this book. At the same time, the whole
story in set in an occult context, and with references to real occult
practices and views mixed in with fantasy. The hero of the book is a
wizard/witch/sorcerer whose goal is to learn how to use his powers
through the occult. Much is made of the fact that the author wrote while
on welfare on scraps of paper at a cafe. This makes it sound like
everything is totally from her imagination; however, she did not imagine
alchemy, charms, scrying, Nicolas Flamel, astrology, the Dark Side, or
many other occult concepts and information. It is only reasonable to
assume that Rowling did some research or has had some exposure to occult
and magical practices.
The idea of using sorcery to
fight evil, or using “good” magic to fight “bad” magic, is a major
component of the plot. In 1996, a movie called The Craft taught
the audience that using witchcraft to fight evil is good. This movie
helped to galvanize the growing Wicca/witchcraft movement and attracted
a lot of teen girls to Wicca (Llewellyn's New Worlds of Mind and
Spirit, Sept/Oct. 1996, p. 6: "Whether you loved it or hated it,
The Craft created a surge of interest in magick, the occult, and
Witchcraft"). Ask any Wiccan how to defend the practice of witchcraft,
and many will respond that it is okay to use one’s powers “for good.”
How does this message differ from the Harry Potter books? Harry Potter,
far from teaching against the occult, gives a rousing cheer for it.
Those opposed to witchcraft or wizardry are mocked and painted as
stupid.
We are not in world where
witches are crones with black robes and pointed hats or where wizards
and sorcerers exist only in Disney movies. We are in a world where
ordinary people seriously practice witchcraft, sorcery, spells, and
other occult methods. Many witches, psychics, Neo-pagans and others
involved in the occult were my clients when I practiced astrology. A
June 14, 1999 article of “Publishers’ Weekly Online,” discusses how
popular pagan books have become among younger readers. At that point,
Teen Witch had sold more than 50,000 copies. Llewellyn’s
director of trade sales stated that his company (which publishes occult
titles) started “repackaging ‘classic’ pagan titles with more youthful
covers, and sales often jumped tenfold as a result,” (Michael Kress,
“Bewitching Readers With Pagan Lore,
<www.bookwire.com/pw/images2/relig2.jpg>). One of the books
discussed is a book on “white witchcraft.” Essential to this philosophy
is to not go over to the “dark side” and practice “dark” or “black”
witchcraft, exactly what is taught in Harry
Potter.
There is a difference between
fantasy and the occult. Fantasy can be used in a way that totally leaves
out references to the occult. But this is not what happens in this book;
instead, fantasy feeds on the occult and is fueled by it. Yes, this is
just a story, but stories can teach and influence. Stories can present
ideas and endorse worldviews. Does this book desensitize children to the
occult? What happens when they get older and encounter peers who
practice magick, cast spells, and attempt spirit contact? These
practices are becoming more popular, and are already widespread among
adolescents.
Harry Potter glorifies
the occult. God condemns the occult. Should we take a book lightly that
endorses what God has so seriously forbidden?
If your children are already
reading these books, then use the books as a tool to teach them from
God’s word what He says about the occult. Teach them how to share this
information gently and lovingly with their friends. It is essential they
be equipped to deal with the increasing acceptance of occultism in our
culture.
NOTES:
(A) Biblical terms for
occult practices:
Several terms are used in both the Old and New
Testaments to describe practices similar to magic and sorcery. There is
an Old Testament word, qacam, from which comes
divination in some Bible version while in others it is
translated as witchcraft. In addition, there are several Old
Testament words from which one can derive sorcerer, witch,
astrologer, or magician. Many of these words share origin
in meaning even though the words themselves differ. For example, a word
translated as astrologer might come from a root word meaning to
divide up the heavens. Some words for witch, sorcerer, or
casting spells in the OT come from a word meaning to whisper or
hiss, to mutter magical words or incantations; to enchant; to practice
magic, to be a sorcerer, to use witchcraft, kashaph, so the
noun form, kashshaph, means an enchanter, sorcerer or magician
(“Lexical Aids to the Old Testament,” The Hebrew-Greek Key Study
Bible, ed., Spiros Zodhiates, AMG Publishers, 1990, p. 1737
[lexical sources on p. 1705]). The use of this word is an onomatopeia
because it is meant to sound like the hiss or whisper of one doing
spells. In the New Testament, sorcerers is used in Rev. 21:8
and 22:15 while sorceries is used in Rev. 9:21 and 22:15. The
words used here (Strong’s #5332 and 5331) are pharmakeus
meaning a druggist or poisoner and by extension, a magician or sorcerer
(Strong’s, “Greek Dictionary of the New Testament,” 95). In Gal. 5:20,
this same word is translated as witchcraft in the King James
Version.
There is a tremendous crossover
and overlap in the translation from the Hebrew and Greek into English
due to the fact that all these practices relate to occult arts. Giving
the English translation for these words depends a lot on context and
what the particular practice of the occultist was, which could have
included many things. What is being done seems more important than an
exact term for it. The most common English translations seems to be
witch, sorcerer, spiritist, magician, soothsayer, and
divination.
(B) Brief overview of
magic/sorcery:
Magic as a ritual or technique to supernaturally
manipulate forces goes back as far as early man and is found in cave
paintings. Magic is common in Greek mythology, Homer, Canaanite
religious literature, Akkadian myths, and Egyptian religion and myths
(Colin Brown, ed. and trans., The New International Dictionary of
New Testament Theology, vol. 2 {Grand Rapids: Zondervan and
Paternoster, 1976}, 552-4). Magic is found in Egyptian papyri dating
from the 3rd and 4th centuries AD; and in Greece magic was a combination
of Greek and Egyptian influences. This included belief in creatures
half-man, half-animal and in the magic power of words. Magical practices
infiltrated Judaism, often using the name of God (New Int’l
Dictionary, 556), although these practices were strictly forbidden
in Hebrew Scripture (Deut. 18: 9-12; Lev. 19: 26, 31, 20:6; Jer. 27:
9-10; Malachi 3:5).
Magic, also known as
sorcery, can be defined as casting spells using a special formula of
words or actions to gain control and also as a technique for
manipulating supernatural forces to attain certain ends through contact
with spirits and psychic realms. White magic was believed to be used for
good ends; black magic for evil ends (New Int’l. Dictionary,
552, 6). A magician can be defined as one possessing occult
knowledge as a diviner, or an astrologer. It is one who tries to bring
about certain results beyond man’s normal abilities. In Egypt and
Babylon, magicians were educated and wise in science; they were priests.
They were thought to possess special knowledge and so were used by
rulers to interpret dreams (Zondervan, vol. 4, 38).
The New International
Dictionary lists pharmakos as a related term (though a different
word) because herbs were traditionally gathered and used for spells and
to invoke spirits at magical ceremonies (p. 558). Python is
also listed as a related term because of its connection to the Delphi
oracle. Delphi was where Apollo killed the serpent Python that guarded
the oracle. Python came to mean a spirit of divination; also, a
ventriloquist was believed to have this spirit in his belly. This term
is used in Acts 16:16 for the girl in Philippi who had the pneuma
pythona, a spirit of divination or literally, a spirit of a python
(p. 558).
SOURCES:
Brennan, J. H. Magick
for Beginners, The Power to Change Your World. St.Paul: Llewellyn,
1999.
Brown, Colin, ed. and trans. The New International
Dictionary of New Testament Theology. Vol. 2. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan and Paternoster, 1976.
Cowell, Alan. “All Aboard the
Potter Express,” The New York Times. 7-10-00.
Crow, W.
B. A Fascinating History of Witchcraft, Magic, and Occultism.
Hollywood: Wilshire Book Company, 1968.
De Grivy, Grillot.
Witchcraft, Magic & Alchemy. Dover publications,
1971.
Farrar, Janet and Stewart. A Witches’ Bible.
Custer, WA: Phoenix Publishing, 1996.
Gonzalez-Wippler, Migene.
The Complete Book of Spells, Ceremonies & Magic. 2d ed. St.
Paul: Llewellyn, 1996.
Guiley, Rosemary. Encyclopedia of
Witches and Witchcraft. New York: Checkmark Books/Facts on File,
1999.
Kelly, John. “The Magic Words: Potter Is a Hit in 33
Languages,” The Washington Post, “KidsPost.”
7-7-00.
Kress, Michael. “Bewitching Readers With Pagan Lore,”
Publishers Weekly Online. June 14, 1999,
<www.bookwire.com/pw/images2/relig2.jpg>.
Ravenwolf,
Silver. Teen Witch. 1st ed. St. Paul: Llewellyn,
1998.
Sadoul, Jacques. Alchemists and Gold. Trans. from
the French by Olga Sieveking. G. P. Putnams’ Sons: New York,
1970.
Smoley, Richard and Jay Kinney. Hidden Wisdom, A Guide
to the Western Inner Traditions. New York: Penguin/Arkana,
1999.
Spence, Lewis. An Encyclopedia of Occultism.
Citadel Press/Carol Publishing, 1996.
Strong, James. The New
Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible.Nashville: Nelson,
1995.
Tenney, Merrill C. and Steven Barabas, eds. The
Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible. 5 Volumes. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 1975.
Tresidder, Jack. Dictionary of
Symbols. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1997.
Tyson,
Donald. The Truth About Ritual Magick. Llewellyn Publications,
1994.
Unger, Merrill F. The New Unger’s Bible
Dictionary. R. K. Harrison, ed.Chicago: Moody, 1985.
USA
Today, 6-22-00.
Whitcomb, Bill. The Magician’s
Companion. St. Paul: Llewellyn, 1994.
Zodhiates, Spiros.
“Greek Dictionary of the New Testament,” The Hebrew Greek Key Study
Bible, New American Standard. Chattanooga: AMG Publishers, 1984,
1990.
________. “Lexical Aids to the Old Testament,” The
Hebrew-Greek Key Study Bible, New American Standard. AMG
Publishers, 1990.
Back to top