The Battle For God's Grace
By Fred Handschumacher
"Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." (Rom. 3:24)
The knowledge of God's Grace is crucial for the New Testament believer. Due to the length of this article print it out for future reference. The subject is too important. My goal is not just to cover the topic of grace, but also to provide a defense against its distortion. It may surprise you...God's grace has many enemies among professing Christians. As I talk to believers and visit various Christian sites on the Internet I'm shocked to see the "toxic" and condemning doctrines that travels under the label, "the gospel". The reader needs to know that these groups are not in a minority!
If you're new to Christianity, our opening Scripture from Romans 3:24 is one of the most important in the New Testament--if not the whole Bible! The word "justified" is a status or "state of being" that anyone can enjoy with God. In order to be justified only a few conditions need to be met: First, you must place your faith in Jesus Christ as your resurrected (raised from the dead) Lord and redeemer. Second, you must receive your justification as "freely given", which means you must have no dependence on religious works, performance or church affiliation. The words, "justified freely," means that God grants justification without any merit or performance requirements on your part. Christians in previous generations understood it in the phrase "Just as I am" (which is also the name of a popular hymn). The clearest definition of the word justification is: Just-As-If-I-Had-Never-Sinned. It's a relationship where God treats you "as if you had never sinned"! This freely given divine acceptance is granted the instant you believe on Jesus Christ and is never revoked. It's issued to you on the basis of "faith in Christ alone". This is God's grace and it's exciting news. Yet, as clearly as it's stated in the New Testament you won't find it practiced in many church organizations or denominations. Today, I consider the pure message of God's grace to be in crisis. It's under attack for various reasons that we'll discuss later during this article.
God's Gospel of Grace is the most life-changing truth in the Bible. The word "gospel" means "good news". The Gospel of Grace is good news! Some refer to grace as... "God's-Riches-At-Christ's-Expense". That phrase is worth thinking about. Most Christians throw the word "grace" around without knowing any of its Scriptural foundation. Much of what Christians think is God's grace really isn't--and we'll discuss that later as well. Critics of the grace message use names like greasy grace, cheap grace or "easy believism" to mock and discredit it. It's important to know that because God's grace (or God's divine favor) comes at no cost to you--that doesn't mean it's "cheap" or easy. Grace cost Jesus everything--and he paid the price for you! Would you call everything Jesus suffered at the cross "cheap"? Could you look Jesus in the eyes and tell Him, "Your cross and your blood was a cheap price to pay"? Those who use these terms don't know what they're talking about. Yet, many are professing Christians--and some are preachers.
Another definition of "grace" is "God's unmerited favor". The blood of Christ purchased God's favor. The only way to enjoy it is to recognize you can't earn it or perform for it. Receiving God's grace has nothing to do with the church you go to or whether you attend a church organization at all!
What does this have to do with the Gospel? Currently, we're in what's called "The Church Age" or "The Age of Grace". When we use the term "Church" we're not talking about a church building, religious organization or denomination. In the New Testament the term "Church" comes from the Greek word "ekklesia" meaning "a called out people". The New Testament Church consists of all Christians...a "called out" company of believers. The Church is something that Jesus is building...Jesus said, "I will build My Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it". What many call "the church" is not the Church at all!
The New Testament discusses two primary groups of people; Israel and the Church (also known as the Body of Christ). Never make the mistake of combining those two groups. Israel and the New Testament Church are two separate and distinct groups of people and the Bible treats them differently. After Jesus died and was resurrected Israel was given 12 apostles with Saint Peter being one of the chief apostles. Early in the book of Acts God raises up another apostle, Saint Paul. God appoints Paul as the apostle to the Gentiles (Rom. 11:13). It is a unique and special appointment. It is clearly stated that the gospel Saint Paul preached is for the Gentiles. The word "Gentiles" describes all peoples (races) not under the authority of the Mosaic Law. The Law is something God gave specifically to Israel (the Jews--also known as the circumcision). The modern church tends to ignore this fact and redefine the gospel message to fit religious tradition. The unintended consequence of redefining the gospel is confusion, fear and spiritual bondage for God's children. It distorts God's character and our conception of Him. Yet, to most Christians who fail to discern truth, it appears to be solidly based on Scripture. Yet, Scripture is used out of context to defend this "redefined" gospel.
The Gospel of Grace provides great liberty and freedom for the Christian. Now, we'll see why. The core of Paul's gospel is found in the book of Romans. Paul teaches that our faith is patterned after the example of Abraham in the Old Testament. Abraham is referred to as "the father of faith" and had a unique relationship with God.
"What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory, but not before God.
For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness." (Rom 4:1-3 KJV)
Notice that the type of faith Abraham had brings "a righteousness without works". This is important! God made a promise to Abraham in Genesis chapter 15 and Abraham "believed" what God said. That simple act of "believing" caused God to credit righteousness to him. This act of "believing" or faith is the one requirement for salvation, righteousness, justification and sanctification for the New Testament Church. The Gospel of Grace teaches that salvation is secured by confessing with our mouth that Jesus Christ is Lord and believing that God resurrected (raised) him from the dead (Rom. 10:9-10). In other words...our faith in Jesus Christ as our resurrected Lord is the ONLY requirement for salvation. Keeping religious law (including the Mosaic Law), performance, church attendance and church affiliation can NEVER earn, maintain or add to our salvation. I call it the "simple gospel". Some professing Christians believe that our initial "salvation by faith" gets us in the door, but good works are needed to keep us in God's favor or to compensate for sin. This belief distorts God's grace, yet is popular in the modern church.
On down in Romans chapter 10 Paul simplifies things even more by saying...
"For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." (Rom. 10:13 KJV)
In that same chapter Paul says that you can't call upon someone in whom you haven't believed! So, if you sincerely call upon the Lord Jesus for salvation--you've satisfied the faith part!
When you think about it...because God so loves the world (John 3:16-17) and His desire for all to be saved (1 Tim. 2:3-4)--the gospel has to be simple so that it includes everyone, even those with mental and physical disabilities. If salvation was riddled with performance requirements and complicated doctrine--few would get in. Yet, God wants everyone in! A perfect picture of this is the story of the thief on the cross hanging next to Jesus during the crucifixion.
"And one of the malefactors which were hanged railed on him, saying, If thou be Christ, save thyself and us. But the other answering rebuked him, saying, Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation? And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this man hath done nothing amiss. And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise." (Luke 23:39-43 KJV)
Another example of the Grace Gospel occurs when Paul and Silas are thrown in jail in Philippi during one of their missionary journeys. During the night God sends an earthquake that opened the doors to the jail. The jail keeper was awakened and...
"Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas, And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house." (Acts 16:29-31 KJV)
If all these examples are not enough God puts to rest any doubts by saying...
"Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." (Rom. 3:24 KJV)
And again...
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." (Rom. 6:23 KJV)
And again...
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." (Eph. 2:8-9 KJV)
The Gospel Of Grace--The Legal Foundation
How can God grant eternal life as a gift? The answer: Someone else paid the price. Yet, it goes further than just "paying the price". To understand the Gospel of Grace you have to see things from God's perspective. Jesus Christ as the spotless, sinless Son of God was innocent, yet sacrificed Himself at the cross as being guilty. He willingly bore the guilt and punishment for us. As a result of this act...the innocent and sinless dying for the guilty; a divine principle is set into motion. When Jesus was crucified on the cross--God "reckoned" or credited us as the ones being crucified. Justice, that demanded the death sentence for our sin was satisfied by the execution of Jesus. We were the guilty ones. God credited every spiritual benefit that Jesus suffered to pay for on the cross--to us. It was a divine exchange. Yet, we (as Pilate released Barabbas in the place of Christ) are set free. You can read about this principle in Romans 7:1-4. Paul tells us that the law (the source of sin's power over us) "has dominion over a man as long as he lives". Paul uses the analogy of a married woman being bound by law to her husband...and if she marries someone else she is called an adulteress. Yet, if her husband dies she is loosed from the law and free to marry another--and she is not considered an adulteress. Paul then says the following:
"Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God." (Rom. 7:4 KJV)
And again...
"Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth. For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory." (Col. 3:2-4 KJV)
And again...
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain." (Gal 2:20-21 KJV)
Important Note: There is a universal principle in Scripture that is binding on everyone who is born into this world...
"And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment..." (Heb. 9:27 KJV)
This Scripture reveals the real miracle of the sacrifice of Jesus and the Gospel of Grace. Up until the cross all of mankind was appointed by God to die once and then face his judgment. Now, in God's mind, we died at the cross AND we were judged and punished for our sin in the body of Jesus Christ. Our death in Christ terminated the law's dominion over us and, at the same time satisfied God's requirement to "die once". As a result we are living on the other side of death and free from the law that empowers sin's dominion over us! The dominion of the law (and therefore sin) terminates upon our death. Sin is permanently remitted, which is why it can never be a barrier to receiving salvation under the Gospel of Grace. Our "death in Christ" is God's perspective of our current position and it's a finished and established fact in heaven. Yet, religious thinking robs us of the liberty and freedom of this truth. Few Christians realize that religion (a counterfeit of Christianity) can't survive without the ability to use the guilt of our sins to control us. The Gospel of Grace takes away this control, which is why it's under attack by so many leaders in the modern church. The Gospel of Grace is good news! It sets us free.
The Gospel Of Grace--An Endangered Truth
I came to Christ in the revival sweeping America around 1969. A benefit of this experience was discovering the importance of God's Grace. Since that time I am concerned about the increased attacks on this crucial truth. Many of God's precious people hardly notice the war. Most violations of the Grace Gospel is camouflaged by emotional manipulation, legalistic teaching, clergy intimidation and high-powered church programs. I've learned there are hundreds (and perhaps thousands) of different versions of the gospel within Christian Orthodoxy. Yet, these different gospel "versions" boil down to just two primary types. Early in my Christian walk I often said (in frustration) that there seems to be two different gospels circulating in the church. Yet, I couldn't specifically define the source. You see, there can't be two or more different "valid" gospels. On the day of Pentecost we entered the Church age (the age of Grace) and according to Saint Paul there's only one gospel that's valid (Galatians 1:7-9). Saint Paul referred to the Church Age Gospel by different names such as: My gospel, the Gospel of Grace, the Gospel of Christ, and the Gospel to the uncircumcised. It is commonly known as "the Gospel of Grace". Yet, confusion exists because most spiritual leaders defend their brand of gospel as "the Gospel of Grace". Taking their defense at face value without a close examination is disastrous for believers. I used to talk generally about this age-old crisis as the difference between a law-based (legalistic) and a grace-based gospel. While my focus wasn't far from the truth it didn't expose the real problem. In the modern church it's popular to blur the difference between law and grace--using the argument that "the end justifies the means". The law sets up an environment of fear and bondage, making it easy to control people (for their own good of course). Religion has been practicing these things for centuries. The reformer, Martin Luther, fought the doctrines of the Roman Church for these same reasons. God showed Luther the mystery of God's grace in the Holy Scriptures and it changed his life. Surprisingly, the battle continues today. Yet, Saint Paul sounds a sober warning to those who modify the Grace Gospel. Paul repeats the warning twice, alerting us to pay special attention.
"I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." (Gal 1:6-9 KJV)
Saint Paul used strong words that should demand our attention. First, he accuses those that preach a different gospel other than the one he preached as "perverting the Gospel of Christ". If that wasn't strong enough he continues to say that a curse is on those who practice such things. That alone should be enough. Yet, much of the modern church ignores the warning and preaches a contrary gospel. Paul's epistle is addressed to the Galatian church that abandoned a salvation by grace for a salvation by keeping religious law. Paul's biggest battle among the churches he cared for was keeping a "perverted" or law-based gospel out. A law-based gospel requires the keeping of Old Testament law or man-made religious laws to gain salvation, maintain salvation or earn God's favor in some way. This "perverted gospel" is subtle and covert in its methods! Saint Paul called it a system of bondage, torment and fear. Another name for it is legalism. I use the term "performance-based Christianity" because it persuades Christians that God isn't pleased with them unless they're at some level of "performance". In the modern church this law-based gospel is never advertised as "legalism" but covertly defended as "grace". I consider this practice one of the biggest threats to the Christian because of the unintended consequences. I've found that a truly pure "Grace Gospel" as taught by Saint Paul is rare in our day. This fact is troubling and demands some answers.
Recognizing The "Toxic" Gospel
The "perverted gospel" that Paul referred to takes many forms. Some varieties are mildly legalistic, while others are psychologically ruthless to believers. These doctrines have no power until we think they represent God's intentions and will for us. A person's devotion to God is a very powerful motivational force. It was the foundation for the bombing of the World Trade Center on September 11th. The terrorists were religiously motivated. They believed they were carrying out God's will. We're not trying to compare teachers in the modern church with terrorists, yet the theological principle is the same. Whoever is given power to manipulate your devotion to God--controls you. That's why so many spiritual leaders are trained in the art of persuasive psychology. Once anyone convinces you that their doctrine is from God--the hard part is over. If that doctrine happens to be one of the many forms of a "perverted gospel" you may never enjoy spiritual freedom for the rest of your life unless God sends someone to help you. That's why I use the word "toxic" in these discussions. There are "gospels" floating around that are toxic or poisonous to a Christian's faith. That's why knowing God's Word for yourself is so important. It limits the options of those who would ensnare you with their words. Saint Paul spent a lot of effort warning the early Christians about these people. Jesus referred to them as "wolves in sheep clothing".
There are two general characteristics that we can use to identify what I call "the toxic gospel", or a works-grace mixed gospel. The "toxic gospel" is one that is dangerously legalistic and condemning in nature. It creates spiritual bondage while still providing "the basic essentials" for salvation.
From Inside Out: The Gospel of Grace works on the believer by inwardly changing their heart. Eternal life is imparted to anyone the moment they place faith in Jesus Christ. Yet, the change on the inside may or may not be immediately visible. With some there's a difference immediately; with others change may take place over a period of years. In either case, our heavenly Father begins to work in that person's life beginning from the inside and working toward the outside where people can see the result...as godly works and spiritual fruits of various types. Yet, the Grace Gospel warns that good works never create, contribute or add to salvation. Obtaining salvation through faith only (without works) is the mark of the Gospel of Grace.
From Outside In: The toxic gospel works differently. Those who preach it insist that the Christian must live at some level of "performance" or holiness to be acceptable to God. When you press them to give specific information on what the performance level is--they can't. The reason: The performance criteria changes depending on the church you are a member of. That makes it difficult to have assurance of salvation, doesn't it? This type of gospel takes the form of demanding certain works or some "high level of piety" in order to remain acceptable to God. It attempts to produce "righteous living" through works that change us from "the outside in". In some church groups it's obvious; in other groups it's subtle and hidden. Groups that believe in this gospel are always talking about our sinfulness and how God purifies us through tragedy, sickness or some form of hardship or disaster. The Bible labels this behavior as "self-righteousness" and the practice is condemned by the Grace Gospel.
I don't want to leave the impression that works aren't necessary in the Christian life. The Bible says godly works are important--and so do I. Yet, godly works are a product of a living "internal" faith in Jesus Christ. Imposing works from the outside as a requirement to be a Christian creates many forms of spiritual bondage. But, allowing works to flow naturally from a changed heart is freedom and liberty. The problem is that religion hates to wait for the fruit to appear naturally. The modern church is dominated by a philosophy called "pragmatism". Simply understood, this is a subtle ideology that changes Biblical doctrine into man-made traditions or teachings that compel immediate visible results. Pragmatism is inherently humanistic and unbiblical. Yet, it creates an atmosphere that makes "the church" look good. Unspiritual Christians are an embarrassment and sometimes bad "advertisement" for the organization attempting to entice new members. This is only one reason a "works-based" Christianity and pragmatic practices are imposed on churchgoers. The other reason is a sincere, yet misplaced belief that God demands a certain level of performance before he accepts anyone. If you sin or somehow fail to "live up to the standards" you become a candidate for "purification" through the fiery trials of God's judgement on your life. Some concerned theologians refer to this as the doctrine of "Protestant Purgatory".
Churches involved in teaching such things may never admit to believing in "purgatory". This is especially true if they're of a Protestant persuasion. Yet, that's exactly what their doctrine suggests. Purgatory is a Roman Catholic belief that's been around for centuries. It's a place of suffering and torment where "Christians" are "purged" or purified from their sins, before they are admitted to heaven. On the subject of the toxic gospel, this purification or purging can be in this life and in the after-life! If you're an "average" Christian struggling with sin...this gives you something to look forward to, doesn't it? So where do these ideas about purification and purging of sin come from? You won't find them in God's Gospel of Grace. Yet, you will find them connected to the demands of the Mosaic Law given to Israel. Purification from sin through judgement and "fiery" trials is a characteristic of the law. Yet, Saint Paul tells us that the law and the Gospel of Grace have nothing to do with each other. Under grace, the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses (purifies) us from all sin. When God tells us that his acceptance and justification is given freely, He means freely. When the Gospel of Grace says that our sin is forever remitted (cancelled) by the blood of Christ, it means exactly what it says. The blood of Jesus provides the Christian with all the purification he or she needs for the rest of their earthly life. Under the law purification from sin is provided through fiery trials and tribulation. Under God's Grace purification from sin is provided freely through the blood of Christ! Jesus bore the judgement, fiery trials and the "purgatory" that achieved our purification from sin. He did it for us. This is real spiritual freedom.
There are many types of the toxic gospel. This causes confusion during any discussion of the topic. Many teach (as I do) that salvation is a free gift. You might say, what's "toxic" about that? It's hard to disagree with God on this point since it's a Scriptural fact. Yet, the problem becomes apparent "after" salvation is received. The teacher of the toxic gospel focuses on the need for certain works and religious performance in order to maintain salvation, or to be continually accepted by God. If you fail to meet the standards (whatever they may be) you're a candidate for God's purifying trials. Again, this idea originates from the Mosaic Law and not from the Gospel of Grace. Our goal in these studies is to show that the New Testament covers two different gospels that are meant for two different groups of people. The "gospel for the circumcision" (Israel) includes a commitment to the Mosaic Law that includes this idea of purging and purification of sin through fiery trials. God never intended for this gospel to apply to the Church age Christian who is under Grace. Saint Paul's Gospel of Grace (the gospel for the uncircumcision/the Gentiles) achieves purification from sin as the finished work of the blood of Christ. That's why its called grace!
I study endtime Bible prophecy--and the toxic gospel is predominant in this area. Everywhere, I read how God is going to "punish" and purify disobedient Christians for their sins by allowing them to suffer the Tribulation period at the end of this age. Visions and dreams abound originating from self-proclaimed "spiritually gifted" Christians that confirm this future suffering. One person shared a dream that Christians would go through the Tribulation and suffer greatly for their disobedience and sin (Hmmm. . .I thought Jesus already did that for us). She explained how God would "purify" his people and that He would turn a deaf ear to their cries and sufferings because they "were ensnared by the cares of the world", or "loved pleasure more than they loved God", or some other failure. Maybe you're someone unfamiliar with endtime prophecy. We should all be knowledgeable about endtime events because time is about to expire. Yet, these kind of people seem to thrive on tormenting Christians purified and cleansed by the blood of Christ. The torment and anxiety created by these toxic gospels are unimaginable. Yet, millions are trapped by the condemning doctrine they believe is from God. It cheats us out of the joy and freedom we have in Christ...and it angers me greatly. I can only imagine how the Lord feels about it, since He paid such a high price to set us free. I want to see people set free through the Gospel of Christ. But many try to manipulate and dominate other Christians through fear. The way they do it is to preach a gospel that seems to prove that God will punish you if you don't meet their performance standards. This is not just toxic--it's down right poisonous to the faith of believers.
Are There Two Gospels In The New Testament?
The answer is found in Galatians chapter 2 (read the whole chapter). Saint Paul clearly discusses the two gospels AND the fact that they are different. Paul makes it clear that he did not receive the Gospel he preached from the other apostles. Paul plainly states that he received his Gospel by revelation from God. Bible scholars call it, "The Pauline Revelation". Paul's revelation contains the core doctrine of Grace for the Church Age. Reformer Martin Luther used Paul's revelation as the basis for his teaching on "justification by faith". This was the core doctrine of the Reformation period and provided the foundation for challenging the legalistic doctrine of the Roman Church at that time. Yet, Paul's revelation is subtly redefined by modern church leaders because legalism provides a more powerful method for motivating people. Again, the end justifies the means--but not with God.
Below, Saint Paul discusses the two gospels...
"But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision." (Gal 2:7-9 KJV)
In the New Testament the circumcision is understood to be Israel (the Jews) as the ones God entrusted with the Mosaic Law. The uncircumcision is a term used for the Church made up mainly of Gentiles and Jews. The New Testament makes a clear distinction between Israel and the Church (see Rom. 1:13 & 2:10). They are TWO separate groups--and according to Galatians chapter 2 they have separate and distinct gospels. Most Christians assume that the gospel for the uncircumcision and the gospel for the circumcision are the same. They are similar in that they both require faith in Christ for salvation, yet they differ in other important ways.
I know that God's Word does not contain "contradictions". Yet, why does the gospel found in the books Matthew, Mark, Luke and John differ from the one that Paul taught the Gentile church? Well meaning people insist that they are the same--that the differences represent "two sides of the same coin"--or different perspectives of the same truth. Yet, these excuses are not true for many reasons.
Most Christians never stop to think about the primary mission of Jesus Christ and the twelve apostles who followed Him. Jesus states His mission very plainly. Yet, we gloss over His words without giving it a second thought and make some disastrous assumptions. The passage below reveals an often over-looked truth.
"And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But He answered her not a word. And His disciples came and besought Him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But He answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Then came she and worshipped Him, saying, Lord, help me. But He answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour." (Matt 15:22-28 KJV)
First, notice that Jesus states His primary mission: "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Next, notice that the woman seeking Jesus' help is a Gentile. Now, most of us who are Christians today are Gentiles. Yet, Jesus' first response is to refuse her request. He called the healing she was seeking "the children's bread". The children's bread Jesus spoke of was for Israel only--not for Gentiles. To make his point Jesus essentially called her "a dog!" This passage outlines an important truth. Initially, Jesus was only sent to Israel--not the Gentiles. Some claim the gospel that Jesus and the 12 apostles preached was the "Gospel of the Kingdom". I tend to agree with this definition. Israel was under Roman domination at the time and was waiting for the Messiah to restore the Kingdom to Israel. The restoration of the Kingdom was constantly on the mind of the disciples. The Jewish disciples asked Jesus one final question before he ascended to heaven after His resurrection, "Wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?" (Acts 1:6). Again, remember that Jesus originally came as Israel's Messiah. He came as Israel's King--not to the Gentiles.
The fact that His message and gospel is only for Israel is stressed even further by the commands Jesus gave to his twelve disciples...
"These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give." (Matt 10:5-8 KJV)
The spiritual administrations of the kingdom of Israel and the Church are vastly different. That point cannot be over-emphasized.
Click on the link below for more important information.
Israel And The Church: The Differences
God Changes Plans
We know that Israel rejected Jesus as her Messiah, which is why God redirected His salvation to the Gentiles. As a result, God called a special man to be the apostle to the Gentiles (Romans 11). His name was Saint Paul. Yet, the most outstanding characteristic of Paul's ministry is the unique gospel God gave him. Paul called the gospel he preached "My Gospel". Paul tells us that his gospel isn't the same as the "gospel for the circumcised" that was preached to Israel by the other 12 apostles. Paul's gospel is designed for the uncircumcised--those who were outside the Mosaic Law. Paul's gospel was declared to be "a mystery". It was a secret until God revealed it to Paul (The Pauline Revelation), which is why we know it can't be the same gospel. If it were the same--Paul would have simply gone to the Jewish apostles in Jerusalem for instruction and teaching. Paul's gospel, "The Gospel of Grace", was specifically designed for the Church age. This truth caused much division in the early church between Jewish (Israel) and Gentile believers, as we shall see below.
The Clash Of The Two Gospels
Peter At The House Of Cornelius
Saint Peter is one example of the difference between these two gospels. Israel rejected her Messiah and God (unknown to Peter and the rest of the apostles) temporarily froze his dealings with Israel and turned to the Gentiles. Saint Paul (then known as Saul of Tarsus) had not yet received his call to be the "Apostle to the Gentiles" (Rom. 11:13). The task of carrying the message of the cross to the Gentiles was initially given to Peter! God's first Gentile target was a man by the name of Cornelius, a centurion. However, there is a problem. Peter was a "Mosaic Law observant" Jew, and as such was prohibited from entering the house of a gentle, or even speaking to him. Was Peter saved? Absolutely! Yet, he was saved under the "gospel for the circumcised" which allowed obedience to the Law of Moses. Notice this important fact: Peter and the rest of the Jewish apostles were never told that the Mosaic Law had no value in salvation. Jesus certainly didn't tell them because he taught just the opposite (Matt. 19:16-17). The omission of the requirements of the Mosaic Law from the gospel only applied to the "gospel to the Gentiles" (the Gospel of Grace) later preached by Saint Paul (Gal. 2:16, Gal. 2:21, Eph. 2:8-9) !
God, in order to move Peter out of his position in the law, gave him a vision of a great sheet with "all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air"--things that were unlawful for him to eat (read Acts 10). God then commanded Peter to arise "kill and eat". Yet, Peter objected to God's command--so great was the law's dominion over him. The vision was repeated three times with God saying, "What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common." The idea was to convince Peter that it was OK for him to go to the house of a gentile with the message of Christ's cross.
"Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made inquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate, And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there. While Peter thought on the vision, the Spirit said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I have sent them." (Acts 10:17-20 KJV)
Later, after arriving at Cornelius' house, Peter says the following...
"And the morrow after they entered into Caesarea. And Cornelius waited for them, and had called together his kinsmen and near friends. And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man. And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean." (Acts 10:24-28 KJV)
Some might say that only Peter had these convictions about the law. Yet, Scripture reveals that Peter suffered persecution from his Jewish brethren as a result of his actions (in violating the law) with Cornelius. He had some explaining to do.
"And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him, Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them. But Peter rehearsed the matter from the beginning, and expounded it by order unto them, saying..." (Acts 11:1-4 KJV)
From these Scriptures we see that observing the Mosaic Law was not considered wrong among believers who were part of the circumcision (believing Israel). A closer examination reveals that believers of the circumcision and Gentile believers (in the Church) were constantly at odds with each another. Commentaries I've read suggest that some believers of the circumcision never accepted the fact that Gentile believers were authentically saved. This was the world that Saint Paul ministered in. Paul's call from God (as a Jew and a Pharisee himself) is to bring the Gentiles into God's salvation in opposition to the beliefs of many Jewish brethren and peers. Peter may be Paul's closest ally among those of the circumcision. An unbiased examination of Scripture shows that Paul was one of the most persecuted apostle in the New Testament because of the tension between the two gospels! You might say that Paul was "between a rock and a hard place".
Peter's struggle with the law in his encounter with Cornelius' household reveals a tremendous truth that should not be overlooked.
The First Jerusalem Council
Acts chapter 15 (read the entire chapter) covers the first serious clash between the gospel for the circumcised and the gospel for the uncircumcised. This section of Scripture gives us another glimpse into the conflict. Some Bible theologians call this the "First Jerusalem Council". The final decision of the council also gives us the clearest insight into the real freedom that the Gospel of Grace provides the Church. Keep in mind that this council was called to decide if the mostly Gentile Church is required to keep the Mosaic Law in addition to faith in Christ. Also notice that the ones bringing the challenge were "believing" Pharisees. These Pharisees were believers in Christ! Yet, they obviously received salvation with the understanding that keeping the Mosaic Law was normal and required. The gospel these Pharisees received DID NOT discourage the observance of the law. Yet, one of the major tenants of Saint Paul's gospel (gospel of the uncircumcised) is that the Mosaic Law is neither binding nor necessary for the salvation of the Church age Christian. This omission of the law from the requirements of the gospel was one of Paul's core teachings. Herein lies the major difference between the gospel for the circumcised (Israel) and the gospel for the uncircumcised (the Gentile Church). One observes the Mosaic Law, which is natural for the Jews (Israel) and the other (the largely Gentile Church) is NOT required to observe the Mosaic Law. The New Testament covers BOTH these positions, yet only Paul's position is valid for the Church age Christian. Almost without exception Christians recklessly mix these two gospels by failing to "rightly divide" (interpret) the Word of God. In my opinion this is the source of what Paul calls "a perverted gospel" within the modern church and it's found in epidemic proportions.
"And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved. When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question." (Acts 15:1-2 KJV)
"And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them. But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses. And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter." (Acts 15:4-6 KJV)
What's the end result? The council decides in Paul's favor. Unlike the Jews that were saved under the "gospel for the circumcised"...the Gentiles are not under the dominion of the Mosaic Law. This is incredible news! Here's the final verdict from the council:
"For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things; That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
So when they were dismissed, they came to Antioch: and when they had gathered the multitude together, they delivered the epistle: Which when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation." (Acts 15:28-31 KJV)
The Jerusalem council more clearly reveals the conflict between these two primary gospels. The Pharisees who challenged the teaching of Paul were real believers in Christ. Notice that they were not told that their beliefs about the law were wrong! The error was trying to make their beliefs (the gospel for the circumcision) binding upon Gentile believers (the uncircumcision). This was the issue. Yet, today the modern church tends to take both these gospels and mix them together into a disastrous doctrine that has caused untold confusion and spiritual bondage.
Paul Publicly Rebukes Peter For Hypocrisy
Once again, Peter is in trouble because of his commitment to the law. Out of all the other 11 original apostles I believe that Peter, on more than one occasion, was trapped between these two gospels. Yet in this situation, Peter knows what's right, but chooses to avoid the persecution of his brethren in the circumcision by doing what was wrong. Many times God will test us like that--and many times we fail just like Peter did. The situation in Galatians 2:11, once again, shows us the clash between the two gospels: The circumcision (the believing Jews) and the uncircumcision (the mainly Gentile Church).
"But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.
For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?" (Gal 2:11-14 KJV)
From his earlier experience with God over the house of Cornelius, Peter (an apostle of the circumcision) now felt the freedom to eat with Gentile believers. However, when brethren from James (also an apostle of the circumcision) visited he would not eat with the Gentiles in their sight, but would separate himself. Some theologians believe that James had reservations about the authenticity of the salvation of Gentile believers. This illustrates the conflict (caused by the law) between these two groups of believers. Regardless of what the theologians think--Peter believed that these brethren of the circumcision would have a serious problem if they saw him eating with Gentiles. That prompted him to separate himself. Saint Paul viewed it as a threat to the "truth of the gospel". Also, notice that "eating with Gentiles" was also the main cause of Peter's persecution when he visited Cornelius. He probably didn't want the whole incident repeated in public.
These stories illustrate the conflict that existed. This mixture of law was a major problem for Saint Paul and it continues to be a serious problem for those of us today in the "Age of Grace".
Legalism And The Error Of Replacement Theology
I'm convinced that the battle over the Gospel of Grace is another result of the popular doctrine called "Replacement Theology". At the very least it's the result of faulty Bible interpretation. I don't want to be too hard on those who merge the "gospel for the circumcision" and the "gospel for the uncircumcision" together. It wasn't that long ago that I used New Testament Scripture without any regard to these two gospels. Thirty-year-old habits are hard to break. I used to think...if the Scripture was "New Testament" that was good enough! This same attitude is found everywhere in the modern church. The disregard for "rightly dividing God's Word" makes it most difficult to get Church age Christians to properly understand the incredible freedom we enjoy through God's grace. Instead, grace is redefined or mocked using terms like "easy believism" and "cheap grace". Through tactics like this mixing legalism and grace is easily achieved.
Replacement Theology is popular false doctrine--except many Christians in the modern church don't consider it false! Simply put, this doctrine says that because Israel rejected her Messiah--God has permanently rejected her...and replaced her with the Church. This wrong belief forces all Scriptures that applied only to the Jews under the Law...to also apply to the New Testament Church! Unfortunately, this includes the "gospel for the circumcised" with its commitment to the Mosaic Law, which is also present in the New Testament Scriptures.
The Temporary Passing Away Of Israel
After Israel rejected Jesus as her Messiah things changed. God froze his plans for Israel. The changes didn't occur immediately. Yet, in 70 AD (approx. 40 years after Christ's crucifixion) the Romans completely destroyed Jerusalem and the temple (an event Jesus prophesied would happen). It is estimated that over 1 million Jews were slaughtered and thousands more were dispersed to different countries as slaves. At this point Israel ceased to exist as a nation. God had "broken off the natural branches" to the olive tree and grafted in the wild branches (the Gentiles) as Paul described in Romans 11. After this event the Church-Age and the Gospel of Grace is God's only agenda in the earth. This is still true today, but time is running out. We're now in the last of the last days just before Christ's Second Coming. Another change is about to occur in God's plan. The "Fulness of the Gentiles" is about to close and Israel is going to rejoin God's program.
Saint Paul makes it clear that this "breaking off of the natural branches" (Israel) is not permanent. A day would come in the future where God would restore his ancient people to their land and all of Israel would be saved. The Old Testament prophets foretold of Israel's demise...but they also said that Israel, in the final days before Christ's return, would be regathered to its land (promised by God to Abraham and his seed in a blood covenant in Gen. 15)! Many Bible prophecy students were astounded when this actually came to pass...in 1948, against all odds, Israel became a nation again!
For more insight on the differences between these two gospels click on the link below. Some information is repetitive.
Do You Believe The Right Gospel?
For more information about the battle between Law and Grace click on the link below.
Should Christians Obey Jewish Law?
Conclusion
The reason the gospel of the modern church is a mixture of works and grace is that theologians merge the gospel meant exclusively for Israel with Paul's Gospel of Grace designed for the Church Age. They are two separate gospels (similar-but different) meant for two different dispensations. The gospel for the circumcision was right for Jews under the Law of Moses (the house of Israel), yet wrong for Gentiles (everyone else). The gospel for the uncircumcision is right for both groups since the New Testament Church is made up of Jews and Gentiles (yet mostly Gentiles). Saint Paul's Gospel of Grace does not treat the Jews as being "superior" to Gentiles like the gospel meant for the circumcision, but brings both groups (Jew and Gentile) under sin in the same way--"all have sinned and come short of the glory of God." (Rom. 3:23) Under the Grace Gospel Jew and Gentile are treated as "one in Christ Jesus". (Eph. 2:11-22, Gal. 3:28-29). However, this fact should never lead us to commit the doctrinal heresy of combining the gospel of the circumcision and the Gospel of Grace. Yet, this is what occurs in most modern theology.
Both gospels are supported in the New Testament. This is why New Testament Scriptures can be wrongly used to defend the "works-grace mixed gospel". The problem is not lack of Scriptural support. The problem is wrong Bible interpretation and removing Scripture from its context. It creates a doctrine of spiritual bondage while still possibly providing the minimum requirements for salvation. Do you want to take this risk with your eternal destiny?
|
